search
Center for Civic Partnerships
Home Center Information Services Publications Tools and Resources Contact Us
 

Theory of Change  

Top Tips

It is important for organizations to develop and use a theory of change in order to design effective community change initiatives and to accurately evaluate their efforts.  The process of developing a theory of change is usually very helpful in forming a common vision and agreement among diverse stakeholders about what you want to change and how you are going to go about creating that change.  This formal tool helps you articulate the assumptions that underlie the work you are doing and also helps you layout the pathway for achieving your long-term goals.  A theory of change is a powerful communication vehicle for both internal and external audiences. 


What is a Theory of Change?

At its most basic, a theory of change defines how and why you expect the desired outcomes to occur.  It is like a map showing where you are now and how you are going to get where you are going.  It also explains why you think the route you have chosen is the right one.  Leaders in the field have defined theories of change in a variety of ways: 

  • A theory of change is a systematic assessment of what needs to happen in order for a desired outcome to occur. Theories of change should be designed to explain how and why change happens as well as the potential role of an organization's work in contributing to its vision of progress. (Evaluation as a Pathway to Learning, Grantmakers for Effective Organizations).
  • A theory of change is an innovative tool to design and evaluate social change initiatives. By creating a blueprint of the building blocks required to achieve a social change initiative's long-term goal, a theory of change offers a clear roadmap to achieve your results identifying the preconditions, pathways and interventions necessary for an initiative's success. (ActKnowledge and Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change)

  • A theory of change is an explanation of how the organization thinks that social change is brought about. It often identifies the essential preconditions that are need for this change to occur. These preconditions enable the organization to trace a number of outcome pathways": visible and measurable short- and medium-term outcomes that will lead to its long term goals. Finally, it includes a reference to other actors working in parallel and complementary ways in order to achieve that change, which identifies the long-term relations needed with other actors in order to achieve its impact. (Developing a Theory of Change, Keystone)

Most researchers agree that good theories of change are:

1.       Plausible - evidence and common sense suggest that the specified activities will lead to the desired outcomes;

2.       Doable - the initiative has adequate financial, technical, political, institutional and human resources to implement the strategy; and

3.       Testable - the pathways of change are specific and complete enough, with measurable indicators and specified pre-conditions, to track the progress in a credible and useful way.


There are multiple components of a theory of change, some of which vary depending on the template or framework you choose to use to create yours.  The following is a list of generally accepted components common to most theories of change:

  • Contextual Factors
  • Needs/issues
  • Guiding Principles
  • Assumptions and Beliefs
  • Values
  • Preconditions
  • Strategies
  • Expected Change (Short-, Mid-, Long-Term)
  • Ultimate Impact

Why do I need a Theory of Change?

There are myriad of benefits of engaging in the hard work of creating a theory of change:

  • Improves the design of your initiative by increasing the likelihood that all the important factors related to the long-term goal will be addressed
  • Gets and keeps stakeholders on the same page - prevents activities and/or stakeholders working at cross purposes and leads to more realistic expectations
  • Makes it easier to garner funding for the various aspects of your initiative
  • Helps establish spending priorities and allocate resources
  • Makes it easier to sustain, bring to scale and evaluate your program
  • Makes your results more credible because they were predicted to occur in a specific way
  • Helps you communicate the complexity of your initiative to the media, funders, government officials, partners, etc.

You can use your theory: (from Developing a Theory of Change, Keystone) 

  • As a framework to check milestones and stay on course
  • To document lessons learned about what really happens
  • To keep the process of implementation and evaluation transparent, so everyone knows what is happening and why
  • To persuade donors to invest in longer term outcomes rather than short projects
  • As a basis for reports to stakeholders, donors, policymakers, boards

Perhaps the most useful aspect of a theory of change is the discussion and exchange among stakeholders during the development process.  The value of the process can be extended by recognizing that a theory of change is a constantly evolving working document that should be the focus of regular reflection and revision with all stakeholders.

What is the difference between a Theory of Change and a Logic Model?
Essentially a theory of change defines how and why you expect the desired outcomes to occur and usually applies to several programs or the whole organization.  In contrast, a logic model visually presents your understanding of the relationships among your program’s resources, planned activities and anticipated results and usually applies to a single program.  Logic models clarify what you are doing; theories of change clarify why you are doing it.   

Theory of Change

Logic Model

Links outcomes and activities to explain how and why the expected change will occur

Graphically illustrates program components, identifies, inputs, activities and outcomes

Usually starts with a goal before deciding on programmatic components

Usually starts with a program and illustrates its components

Requires justification for program components; specifies the hypothesis about why something will cause something else

Requires identification of program components, but doesn’t show why activities are expected to produce outcomes

Requires identifying indicators to measure outcomes

Sometimes includes indicators to measure outcomes

Best used to design and evaluate a complex initiative

Best used to demonstrate you have carefully identified the inputs, outputs and outcomes of your work

Online Tools, How-To Guides and Practical Resources

Theory of Change - Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change & ActKnowledge
www.theoryofchange.org

This site provides an overview of theory of change principles and history and a helpful glossary of terms.  It walks you through a detailed example of how a collaborative created their theory of change.  The site is designed to help you learn about how to apply a theory of change and how it can improve the design and evaluation planning of your initiative. It also includes a section with advanced topics for more experienced TOC users.  

Theory of Change Online - ActKnowledge & Innovation Network
www.theoryofchange.org and www.innonet.org/pointk
A new interactive, online suite of tools for creating, sharing and using theories of change is being developed by ActKnowledge in partnership with several other organizations.  The tool is being designed to be especially useful for large-scale community initiatives and nonprofits’ reexamination of their mission.  Release is expected in 2008. 

Developing a Theory of Change - Keystone
www.keystonereporting.org/node/115
This manual defines a theory of change and explains the benefits of creating one for your organization.  It provides a framework for a one-day workshop to start the process of creating your theory of change.  The manual includes specific activities and examples of one organization’s products during the workshop process.  


Logic Model Development Guide – Chapter 3, Developing a Theory-of-Change
W.K. Kellogg Foundation

www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf
Chapter 3 in the highly regarded W.K. Kellogg Foundation’s manual, provides a step-by-step process, including a template, checklist and examples for developing a theory of change which is integrated with and supported by your logic model. 
 
Mapping Change: Using a Theory of Change to Guide Planning and Evaluation - Ford Foundation

www.grantcraft.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.viewPage&pageID=808

This brief guide explains why grant makers use theories of change to guide their questioning, unearth assumptions that underlie their work, establish common language, and develop strong action plans. Contributors to the guide also describe how a theory of change sets the stage for evaluation by clarifying goals, strategies and milestones.  Although focused on grant makers, the guide is very useful for grantees as well.  Requires short registration to download the free guide. 
  
      
The Community Builder’s Approach to Theory of Change:  A Practical Guide to Theory Development - Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change
www.aspeninstitute.org/atf/cf/%7BDEB6F227-659B-4EC8-8F84-8DF23CA704F5%7D/rcccommbuildersapproach.pdf
This manual is designed for planners and evaluators who are going to facilitate a process for creating a theory of change with community-based programs and community change initiatives, but can be used by a self-led group or organization.  It uses the Aspen Institute Roundtable’s approach to create “the most robust theories of change possible.”    

Planning and Evaluation Resource Center
www.evaluationtools.org/plan_theory.asp
Provides a brief overview and example of a more simplified approach to creating a theory of change and a listing of resources for additional information on developing a theory of change.  Includes the same information for logic model development.  

Theory of Change: A Practical Tool for Action, Results and Learning - Annie E. Casey Foundation
www.aecf.org/upload/PublicationFiles/CC2977K440.pdf
This 45 page manual produced for the Annie E. Casey Foundation lays out a process for creating a theory of change and provides extensive examples and “learning tips” to guide you through the process.

Learn More about Organizational Learning  

GrantMakers for Effective Organizations Theory of Change
www.geofunders.org/content.aspx?oid=fec9f793-c130-41ed-b6b6-1e3f19a8b63a
This document describes GEO's emerging theory of change, the product of a board-led effort to shape GEO's vision for the future of the organization and the philanthropic sector.  Although specific to funders, it is a very good example of a comprehensive theory of change and insightful for grantees and nonprofit organizations. issue is available online).  


Theories of Change – Beyond Intractability

Shapiro, Ilana. 2005, (Beyond Intractability)

www.beyondintractability.org/essay/theories_of_change/

This essay discusses theories of change in the context of conflict resolution initiatives, although much of the information is generic to theories of change in all fields.  It also provides audio and text comments from researchers and practitioners regarding various aspects of working with theories of change.   

 

Additional Resources Available from The Center for Civic Partnerships  www.civicpartnerships.org; 916.646.8680

 

Organizational Learning and Evaluation Webpage

¨Conferences        ¨Training               ¨Presentations
Copies of presentations and handouts from prior conferences are available 

 

Tip Sheet Series on Organizational Learning & Evaluation

¨Evaluation            ¨Organizational Learning       ¨Logic Models

¨Theory of Change               ¨Quantitative & Qualitative Methods  

Tip Sheets covering a wide range of community building and improving livability topics
 are also available on the Center for Civic Partnerships’ website
www.civicpartnerships.org/toolsRes  

 

 

© Public Health Institute, Center for Civic Partnerships 2007

Back to top